Abstract
We thank Wu et al for their interest and commentary on our article “Endovascular Treatment of Very Small Intracranial Aneurysms: Meta-Analysis.”[1][1] The authors bring up a number of valid points regarding the treatment of small intracranial aneurysms. Overall, we agree with the authors that
Highlights
As the authors aptly point out, the limitations to our metaanalysis are largely reflective of the lack of high-quality studies on the treatment of very small aneurysms
The purpose of our meta-analysis was to inform the interventional community of the risks and benefits of treating very small intracranial aneurysms
We hope that the information obtained from this study will be used in discussing the risks of treating such aneurysms with patients and their families
Summary
As the authors aptly point out, the limitations to our metaanalysis are largely reflective of the lack of high-quality studies on the treatment of very small aneurysms.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
