Abstract
Romer and Kroner (2012) stated “the core of the Harlech Dome (i) in part is made up of Ordovician deposits and (ii) contains tectonic repetitions”. In their comment, Schofield et al. (this issue) distort this statement and state that (i) we claim the entire sedimentary sequence of the Harlech Dome is Ordovician and (ii) we misinterpreted their zircon data. We disagree. In our reply, we demonstrate that the argumentation of Schofield et al. (this issue) is driven by circular argumentation and that their use and interpretation of U–Pb zircon data is inadequate.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
