Reply to the comments by Madsen &amp; Liu on “Late quaternary OSL chronologies from the Qinghai Lake (NE Tibetan Plateau): Inter-comparison of quartz and K-feldspar ages to assess the pre-depositional bleaching”

Hao Long,Jan-Pieter Buylaert,Manfred Frechen,Andrew Sean Murray,Mayank Jain,Sumiko Tsukamoto

doi:10.1016/j.quageo.2018.11.003

Reply to the comments by Madsen & Liu on “Late quaternary OSL chronologies from the Qinghai Lake (NE Tibetan Plateau): Inter-comparison of quartz and K-feldspar ages to assess the pre-depositional bleaching”

Hao Long, Jan-Pieter Buylaert + Show 4 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2018.11.003

Copy DOI

Journal: Quaternary Geochronology	Publication Date: Nov 17, 2018
Citations: 1	License type: other-oa

Affiliation: Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Technical University of Denmark, Nordic Laboratory for Luminescence Dating, Leibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics

#NE Tibetan Plateau #Lake Highstand + Show 8 more

Abstract
Full-Text PDF
Similar Papers

Abstract

Abstract In response to the comment of Madsen and Liu (2018), we explain why our quartz optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages showing the early MIS 3 lake highstand are robust. We also demonstrate that the difference in the age estimates between ours (Long et al., 2018) and other studies should be attributed to contrasting equivalent dose (De) values, rather than water contents (hence the dose rate) which was claimed by Madsen and Liu (2018).

Full Text