Reply to the comment titled “The usage of 238U/207Pb vs 206Pb/207Pb linear regressions for the LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of cassiterite” on the manuscript “Geological, geochemical, and geochronological characteristics of Weilasituo Sn-polymetal deposit, Inner Mongolia, China”

Abstract

The Cuonadong deposit is located in the Cuonadong gneiss dome of the eastern Tethyan Himalaya and is characterized as a large- to superlarge-scale Sn polymetallic deposit in the Himalaya orogen. The mineralization pattern includes skarn W-Sn mineralization in the strong shear zone of the dome mantle, hydrothermal Sn-W veins controlled by north-south-trending rifts (NSTRs), and Be-Rb mineralization in pegmatitic leucogranite. The results of this study show that the zircon U-Pb age of undeformed (postkinematic) leucogranites is 15.5 ± 0.1 Ma (n = 28, MSWD = 1.4), the cassiterite U-Pb age of the vein-type Sn-W orebody is 14.3 ± 0.5 Ma (n = 40, MSWD = 3.2), and the muscovite Ar-Ar age of beryl-bearing pegmatitic leucogranite is 15.2 ± 0.2 Ma (MSWD = 1.5). The isotopic dating results demonstrate that the Cuonadong Sn-W-Be-Rb mineralization has a close genetic relationship with the Miocene (ca. 16–14 Ma) leucogranite magmatic hydrothermal activity in the Cuonadong dome. The deformed (synkinematic) two-mica granite (18 Ma) was cut by the Sn-W ore veins (14 Ma) faulted by NSTRs, indicating that the E-W-trending extension of the NSTRs initiated at ca. 18–14 Ma. The Himalaya leucogranite belongs to a highly fractionated granite with high Sn content (>15 ppm). In conclusion, the Himalaya leucogranite is considered to be tin granite in this study, and therefore, the Himalaya presents high potential for Sn polymetallic mineralization prospecting.