Abstract
In a paper recently published in the European Physical Journal Plus, the author comments on a previous paper published by the European Physical Journal C about Sagnac effect. The author has clearly misinterpreted the paper. I don’t think that this is because of an apparent typo in the Coriolis force, but I think that it is because of some physical concepts that are only implicitly expressed through mathematical calculations. Therefore, I would like to emphasize that I don’t think the author said invalid things, but his considerations are not related to the physical meaning of the paper he wants to analyze.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
