Abstract
In this work, we justify our use of Chicago local precipitation (CLP) as a reference and reinforce our confidence in the anomalous oxygen isotope signal in water from the stratosphere, as a response to a recent critique from Miller (1).
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Paper Title
Journal
Date
