Abstract
Marc Gurgand's remarks on our article, Why Go off the RMI Welfare Program?, must be taken seriously. First, his critique is both precise and courteous, an example of a style of scientific debate we would very much like to see more of in our intellectual universe. Second, we consider certain components of the critique justified, though others seem to us weaker. Third, debate that seeks to establish links between disciplines that ignore each other most of the time even though they study the same objects and at times use the same kinds of material is greatly welcome.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
