Abstract
ABSTRACT In their discussion of our recent publication, Scoon and Mitchell (2020) put forward a number of arguments against the hydromagmatic model of Bushveld Complex formation that we present. Their criticisms of our model focus primarily on the formation mechanisms of the discordant bodies present at Bushveld, namely the iron-rich ultramafic pegmatites and the dunite pipes. While this was a minor portion of our paper, we here review evidence in favor of a fluid-related origin for these discordant bodies, in contrast to the primarily magmatic origin that Scoon and Mitchell present.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
