Abstract
The author agrees the correction noted is right. However, the error did not affect the overall result, and it was an omission from my editing. Equation (11) is the only editing error in the text, and the subscripts of the similar formulas (7) and (10) are correct. The letter in (14) is wrong, but the corresponding formula (3) is written correctly. Readers should be able to identify this by themselves. The original author notes that in the formulas about d0 and d1, there are no mistakes, and the modifications offered are no different from his. He states further that the corrections described in the last paragraph replies are presented in this paper were purely an oversight on his edit of the above-named work [ibid., vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 2471–2481, May 2018], but all data graphs are correct.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
