Abstract
We welcome the opportunity to reply to comments by Axel Liebscher regarding our manuscript (Spandler et al. 2003, Contrib Mineral Petrol 146:205–222). Before discussing the comments, we first wish to state that the phase identified as zoisite in the manuscript should have been labelled as epidote, due to the high ferric iron content. We wish to thank Axel Liebscher and Gerhard Franz for bringing this error to our attention. However, it should be noted that this error does not affect any of the conclusions of the paper, pertaining only to the correct application of epidote-group-mineral nomenclature.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
