Reply to Comment Submitted by Murnick et al. on "Intracavity OptoGalvanic Spectroscopy Not Suitable for Ambient Level Radiocarbon Detection".

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVCommentNEXTReply to Comment Submitted by Murnick et al. on “Intracavity OptoGalvanic Spectroscopy Not Suitable for Ambient Level Radiocarbon Detection”Dipayan Paul and Harro A. J. Meijer*View Author Information Centre for Isotope Research (CIO), Energy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen (ESRIG), University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG, Groningen, The Netherlands*E-mail: [email protected]Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 8, 4574–4577Publication Date (Web):March 25, 2016Publication History Published online5 April 2016Published inissue 19 April 2016https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00473Copyright © 2016 American Chemical SocietyRIGHTS & PERMISSIONSArticle Views528Altmetric-Citations-LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InReddit PDF (904 KB) Get e-AlertsSUBJECTS:Analytical chemistry,Calibration,Carbon-14,Gases,Lasers Get e-Alerts