Abstract
In their lengthy comment on Stucchi et al. (2011), Mucciarelli and Albarello (2012) propose opinions on aspects of the study that have been discussed and reviewed in countless circumstances in Italy and internationally, from the very beginning (2003) to the end (2009) of our research. We have the feeling that Mucciarelli and Albarello fail to recognize that the seismic‐hazard assessment was performed in support of the new Italian building code; and therefore, the relevant decisions were made in agreement with numerous committees of the Italian governmental bodies, sometimes after a good deal of negotiation. Such a lack of perspective is surprising, considering that Albarello contributed to the first phase of the project and was a partner in the second phase, where he was funded on the basis of …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
