Abstract
Any analysis of historical earthquakes is done with the hope that it will help better explain local seismicity or provide new clues to understand independent observations constraining seismotectonic processes. We therefore welcome the comment on our paper (Herak et al. , 2017; hereafter, Hea2017) by Stiros (2017; hereafter, S2017), who suggests that the 1750 Bakar earthquake, one of the three events we analyzed in Hea2017, could have been responsible for at …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
