Abstract
There are a few essential errors in Kiefl's Comment, but he has raised some important issues that need further clarification. Here we address these issues: We discuss the spin dynamics of a magnetic polaron and explain why the fast fluctuation limit proposed in the Comment is inappropriate in this case, even though it would indeed lead to a single-frequency precession pattern under other circumstances. That the formation of a large polaron spin causes a characteristic doublet precession signal is evident from the experimental data. We also show why the alternative interpretations presented in the Comment are not plausible.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
