Abstract
We respond to the Comment on our paper [Phys. Rev. B 105, 195412 (2022)]. The authors of the Comment claim our paper arrived at similar conclusions to their earlier paper [Phys. Rev. D 92, 125005 (2015)]. In this response to their Comment, we outline why we believe our paper is fundamentally different in nature, we review its conclusions, and detail how these are different to those of their earlier work.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have