Abstract
In the name of the authors of the paper "Permeability versus Design in TPMS Scaffolds", published in Materials in 2019 and already counting six citations in Google Scholar to date, I would like to formally respond to the comment manuscript now entitled "Assessing Porous Media Permeability in Non-Darcy Flow: A Re-Evaluation Based on the Forchheimer Equation" [...].
Highlights
To Comment “Assessing Porous Media Permeability in Non-Darcy Flow: A Re-Evaluation Based on the Forchheimer Equation”
In the name of the authors of the paper “Permeability versus Design in triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) Scaffolds”, published in Materials in 2019 and already counting six citations in Google Scholar to date, I would like to formally respond to the comment manuscript entitled “Assessing Porous Media Permeability in Non-Darcy Flow: A Re-Evaluation Based on the Forchheimer Equation”
We would like to thank the authors of the comment manuscript for contributing to the enhancement of the scientific discussion, and to acknowledge the comments of the external reviewer
Summary
We would like to thank the authors of the comment manuscript for contributing to the enhancement of the scientific discussion, and to acknowledge the comments of the external reviewer. To Comment “Assessing Porous Media Permeability in Non-Darcy Flow: A Re-Evaluation Based on the Forchheimer Equation”
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
