Reply to Bromiley's Comment and Further Results: Paradox Lost Becomes Dilemma Found

Abstract

Free AccessAboutSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail Go to SectionFree Access HomeManagement ScienceVol. 37, No. 9 Reply to Bromiley's Comment and Further Results: Paradox Lost Becomes Dilemma FoundTimothy W. RuefliTimothy W. RuefliPublished Online:1 Sep 1991https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.9.1210 Previous Back to Top FiguresReferencesRelatedInformationCited ByRisky business: How strategy relates to survival19 March 2021 | Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, Vol. 38, No. 3A replication of Bowman's paradox across 28 countriesJournal of Innovation & Knowledge, Vol. 3, No. 3On the Relationship between Accounting Risk and Return: Is There a (Bowman) Paradox?29 May 2015 | European Management Review, Vol. 12, No. 2Prospect Theory and Risk-Seeking Behavior by Troubled FirmsJournal of Behavioral Finance, Vol. 12, No. 1The fuzzy integrative evaluation model and empirical study of enterprise strategy risk based on AHP-entropy combination weight methodRisk-Return Association for Italian Non-Financial Firms from a Prospect Theory PerspectiveSSRN Electronic JournalThe risk-return paradox for strategic management: disentangling true and spurious effectsStrategic Management Journal, Vol. 30, No. 3The Risk-Return Paradox for Strategic Management: Disentangling True and Spurious EffectsSSRN Electronic JournalThe Blackwell Handbook of Strategic ManagementTowards An Understanding of Terrorism Risk in the MNEMultinational Business Review, Vol. 13, No. 3Overcoming the Lack of Identification in Bowman’s Paradox Tests: Heteroskedastic Behavior of ReturnsManagement Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, Vol. 3, No. 3Organizational Risk Taking: Learning versus Variable Risk PreferencesSSRN Electronic JournalStrategie risk and competitive advantage: an integrative perspective13 December 2010 | European Management Review, Vol. 1, No. 1Risk and Creativity in AdvertisingJournal of Marketing Management, Vol. 19, No. 5-6A review of research on the negative accounting relationship between risk and return: Bowman's paradoxOmega, Vol. 30, No. 1Shifts of Reference Points for Framing of Strategic Decisions and Changing Risk-Return AssociationsJohannes M. Lehner, 1 January 2000 | Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 1Risk and Return in Organizational Decision MakingAcademy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, No. 3Risk measures in strategic management research: auld lang syne?Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 2Risk measures in strategic management research: auld lang syne?Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 2Risk measures in strategic management research: auld lang syne?Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 2Risk measures in strategic management research: auld lang syne?Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 2Fixed versus variable reference points in the risk-return relationshipJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 29, No. 2Corporate Risk-Return Relations: Returns Variability Versus Downside RiskAcademy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 1Chance Constrained Programming Approach to Empirical Analyses of Mutual Fund Investment StrategiesDecision Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 2 Volume 37, Issue 9September 1991Pages 1067-1215 Article Information Metrics Information Published Online:September 01, 1991 © 1991 INFORMSCite asTimothy W. Ruefli, (1991) Reply to Bromiley's Comment and Further Results: Paradox Lost Becomes Dilemma Found. Management Science 37(9):1210-1215. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.9.1210 PDF download