Abstract
The discrepancy between the results obtained by Gal and Mandelzweig and those published by us is shown to be due to an ambiguity in the definition of the radial wave function occurring whenever the velocity-dependent potential satisfies the criticality condition of Ericson and Myhrer. The non-Hermitian solutions predicted by these authors are closely related to that ambiguity.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
