Reply to: #00279 “Dramatically reduced incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence in gynecologic patients undergoing endoscopic closure with barbed sutures: A retrospective cohort study”

Abstract

Abstract Introduction This retrospective study documented the rate of vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD) in a large series of gynecologic patients who were treated with an endoscopic (robotic-assisted or laparoscopic) hysterectomy that incorporated either delayed absorbable monofilament barbed or vicryl running sutures. Method We sought to discern any prognostic associations between operative variables (e.g., closure type (barbed or vicryl sutures), endoscopic approach (robotic-assisted or laparoscopic), and energy source (Harmonic Ace Shears or monopolar/bipolar electro-surgery)) and the risk for VCD via patient chart review. Statistical evaluation was comprised of univariate analyses and multiple regression. Results We identified 1876 subjects; there were 14 cases (0% with barbed suture and 0.99% with vicryl suture) of VCD (an overall incidence of 0.75%), nearly all of which were associated with a robotic-assisted hysterectomy involving vicryl sutures (p = 0.034). However, the type of endoscopic surgery (P = 0.11) and energy source (P = 0.28) were not significant prognostic factors. The VCD patients' exhibited a median duration of 47 days (range, 14–116) until the development of their condition. Conclusion Vaginal cuff separation subsequent to laparoscopic closure is a rare occurrence. While our incidence of VCD was low and comparable to other reported rates in the literature, we did not observe any cases of VCD following laparoscopic hysterectomy performed with barbed suture closure.