Reply re: "Evaluation of Electronic Health Record Implementation in an Academic Oculoplastics Practice".

Abstract

PURPOSE Despite increasing electronic health record (EHR) adoption, perceptions of EHRs are negative among ophthalmologists due to concerns about productivity, costs, and documentation. The authors evaluated the effects of EHR adoption in an oculoplastics practice, which had not been previously studied. METHODS Clinical volume, documentation time, time spent with patients, reimbursement, relative value units, and patient satisfaction were examined for 2 academic oculoplastics attendings between April 2018 and April 2019, with EHR implementation in September 2018. RESULTS The mean number of patients seen in a half-day clinic was 31.8 versus 27.7 (p = 0.018) pre- and post-EHR implementation, respectively. EHR implementation had no effect on total monthly reimbursement (p = 0.88) or total monthly relative value units (p = 0.54). Average reimbursement (p = 0.004) and relative value units (p = 0.001) per patient encounter were significantly greater with EHR use. Patient satisfaction scores improved (p = 0.018). Mean physician time per patient increased from 6.4 to 9.0 minutes (p < 0.001). Mean documentation time per patient increased from 1.7 to 3.6 minutes (p < 0.001). Average patient wait times decreased by 9 minutes (p = 0.03) with EHR use. No scribes were used. CONCLUSIONS EHR implementation was associated with decreased patient volume without significant differences in total reimbursement. Although EHR adoption was associated with increased physician time devoted to patients and greater time expenditure on documentation, patients experienced decreased wait times. This suggests that EHR use streamlined the overall clinic flow without sacrificing physicians' time with the patient. The author's findings suggest that EHR implementation can be accomplished in an academic oculoplastics setting without negative impact on patient experience or reimbursement considerations.