Abstract
Christensen et al. base their argument on a distinction between ‘open empirical’ and ‘fixed ideological’ studies. This is surely an unhelpful delineation. All text is produced through a position in discourse; all authors are committed in one way or another and empirical evidence never speaks for itself. It is disingenuous to simply claim an ‘open attitude’ and then use this as your trump card. It is better to move beyond, rather than reproduce, unhelpful distinctions between ideology and truth.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
