Abstract

To validate the Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS), the GEMS Map of Air Pollution (GMAP) campaign was conducted during 2020–2021 by integrating Pandora Asia Network, aircraft, and in situ measurements. In the present study, GMAP-2020 measurements were applied to evaluate urban air quality and explore the synergy of Pandora column (PC) NO2 measurements and surface in situ (SI) NO2 measurements for Seosan, South Korea, where large point source (LPS) emissions are densely clustered. Due to the difficulty of interpreting the effects of LPS emissions on air quality downwind of Seosan using SI monitoring networks alone, we used a combination of PC and SI measurements, and explored the synergy of this approach through correlation analysis of PC-NO2 and SI-NO2. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering using vertical meteorological variables combined with PC-NO2 and SI-NO2 yielded three distinct conditions: synoptic wind-dominant (SD), mixed (MD), and local wind-dominant (LD). These results suggested meteorology-dependent correlations between PC-NO2 and SI-NO2. Overall, yearly daytime mean (11:00–17:00 KST) PC-NO2 and SI-NO2 statistical data showed good linear correlations (R = ~0.73); however, these correlations were dependent on meteorological conditions. SD conditions characterized by higher wind speeds and planetary boundary layer heights suppressed fluctuations in both PC-NO2 and SI-NO2, driving a uniform vertical NO2 structure with higher correlations, whereas under LD conditions, stack plumes decoupled from LPS or were transported from nearby cities, weakening correlations through anomalous vertical NO2 gradients. However, under MD conditions, both pollution ventilation due to high surface wind speeds and daytime photochemical NO2 loss contributed to stronger correlations through a decline in both PC-NO2 and SI-NO2 toward noon. Thus, Pandora Asia Network observations collected over 13 Asian countries since 2021 can be utilized for investigation of the vertical complexity of air quality in combination with SI measurements. The results of this study also indicate that caution is required when performing GEMS validation using either PC or SI observations alone, particularly under prevailing local wind meteorological conditions or transport processes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call