Abstract

<strong class="journal-contentHeaderColor">Abstract.</strong> The reduction of fine particles (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and reactive N (N<sub>r</sub>) and S (S<sub>r</sub>) species is a key objective for air pollution control policies because of their major adverse effects on human health, ecosystem diversity, and climate. The sensitivity of global and regional N<sub>r</sub>, S<sub>r</sub>, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> to 20 % and 40 % individual and collective reductions in anthropogenic emissions of NH<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub>x</sub>, and SO<sub>x</sub> (with respect to a 2015 baseline) is investigated using the EMEP MSC-W atmospheric chemistry transport model with WRF meteorology. Regional comparisons reveal that the individual emissions reduction has multiple co-benefits and small disbenefits on different species, and those effects are highly geographically variable. Reductions in NH<sub>3</sub> emissions are effective at decreasing NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations and deposition but much less so for NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>. A 40 % NH<sub>3</sub> emissions reduction decreases regional average NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations by 47&ndash;49 %, while sensitivities of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentrations decrease in the order Euro_Medi (Europe and Mediterranean, 18 %), East Asia (15 %), North America (12 %), and South Asia (4 %), reflecting the increasing regional ammonia-richness. A disbenefit is the increased SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations in these regions (10&ndash;16 % for 40 % NH<sub>3</sub> emissions reductions) because reduced NH<sub>3</sub> levels decrease SO<sub>2</sub> deposition by altering atmospheric acidity. The 40 % NO<sub>x</sub> emissions reductions decrease NO<sub>x</sub> concentrations in East Asia by 45 %, Euro_Medi and North America by ~38 %, and South Asia by 22 %, whilst decreases in fine NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> are regionally reversed, which is related to enhanced O<sub>3</sub> levels in East Asia (and also, but by less, in Euro_Medi), and decreased O<sub>3</sub> levels in South Asia (and also, but by less, in North America). Consequently, the oxidation of NO<sub>x</sub> to NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> and of SO<sub>2</sub> to SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> is enhanced in East Asia but decreased in South Asia, which in East Asia causes a more effective decrease in NO<sub>x</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> but a less effective decrease in NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> and even an increase in SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup>; in South Asia it causes a less effective decrease in NO<sub>x</sub> and an increase in SO<sub>2</sub> but a more effective decrease in NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup>. For regional policy making, it is thus important to reduce NH<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub>x</sub> and SO<sub>x</sub> emissions together and/or go for stronger reductions to minimise such adverse effects in East Asia and Euro_Medi. Reductions in SO<sub>x</sub> emissions are slightly more effective for SO<sub>2</sub> than SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup>. A disbenefit is that SO<sub>x</sub> emissions reductions increase NH<sub>3</sub> total deposition and ecosystem eutrophication (~12 % increase for 40 % emissions reduction). PM<sub>2.5</sub> mitigation in South Asia is most sensitive to 40 % SO<sub>x</sub> reduction (3.10 &mu;g m<sup>-3</sup>, 10 %) and least sensitive to NH<sub>3</sub> reduction (0.29 &mu;g m<sup>-3</sup>, 1 %), which is because South Asia is so ammonia-rich that reducing NH<sub>3</sub> has little impact. The most effective measure for North America is reducing NO<sub>x</sub> emissions with an 8 % (0.63 &mu;g m<sup>-3</sup>) decrease in PM<sub>2.5</sub> in response to a 40 % reduction. In Euro_Medi, the sensitivities of PM<sub>2.5</sub> to 40 % individual emissions reductions range 5&ndash;8 % (0.55&ndash;0.82 &mu;g m<sup>-3</sup>). In the UK and Scandinavia PM<sub>2.5</sub> is more sensitive to NH<sub>3</sub>, in central Europe it is more sensitive to NO<sub>x</sub>, while in the Mediterranean it is more sensitive to SO<sub>x</sub>. In East Asia, reductions in SO<sub>x</sub>, NO<sub>x</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> emissions are almost equally effective with PM<sub>2.5</sub> sensitivities to 40 % reductions of 7&ndash;8 % (1.89&ndash;2.33 &mu;g m<sup>-3</sup>). Due to the varying contributions of SIA, PM<sub>2.5</sub> sensitivities to 40 % collective reductions in all 3 precursors decrease in the order East Asia (20 %), Euro_Medi and North America (17 %), South Asia (13 %). The geographically-varying non-linear chemical responses of N<sub>r</sub>, S<sub>r</sub>, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> to emissions reductions revealed by this work show the importance of both prioritising emissions strategies in different regions and combining several precursor reductions together to maximise the policy effectiveness.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call