Abstract

Antarctic sea ice kinematic plays a crucial role in shaping the polar climate and ecosystems. Satellite passive microwave-derived sea ice motion data have been used widely for studying sea ice motion and deformation processes, and provide daily, global coverage at a relatively low spatial-resolution (in the order of 60 × 60 km). In the Arctic, several validated data sets of satellite observations are available and used to study sea ice kinematics, but far fewer validation studies exist for the Antarctic. Here, we compare the widely-used passive microwave-derived Antarctic sea ice motion product by Kimura et al. (2013) with buoy-derived velocities, and interpret the effects of satellite observational configuration on the representation of Antarctic sea ice kinematics. We identify two issues in the Kimura et al. (2013) product: (i) errors in two large triangular areas within the eastern Weddell Sea and western Amundsen Sea relating to an error in the input satellite data composite, and (ii) a more subtle error relating to invalid assumptions for the average sensing time of each pixel. Upon rectification of these, performance of the daily composite sea ice motion product is found to be a function of latitude, relating to the number of satellite swaths incorporated (more swaths further south as tracks converge), and the heterogeneity of the underlying satellite signal (brightness temperature here). Daily sea ice motion vectors calculated using ascending- and descending-only satellite tracks (with a true ~24 h time-scale) are compared with the widely-used combined product (ascending and descending tracks combined together, with an inherent ~39 h time-scale). This comparison reveals that kinematic parameters derived from the shorter time-scale velocity datasets are higher in magnitude than the combined dataset, indicating a high degree of sensitivity to observation time-scale. We conclude that the new generation of “swath-to-swath” (S2S) sea ice velocity datasets, encompassing a range of observational time scales, is necessary to advance future research into sea ice kinematics.

Highlights

  • Antarctic sea ice kinematic plays a crucial role in shaping the polar climate and ecosystems

  • We conclude that the new generation of “swath-toswath” (S2S) sea ice velocity datasets, encompassing a range of observational time scales, is necessary to advance future research into sea ice kinematics

  • These are in the western Amundsen Sea for the ASC dataset and the Weddell Sea for the DES dataset. These problem regions are evident in the combined product, their impact is masked due to the averaging of ASC and DES velocities. This occurs at an acquisition time of around midnight UTC, where swath duplication has erroneously occurred in the TB DM product

Read more

Summary

Introduction

20 to the number of satellite swaths incorporated (more swaths further south as tracks converge), and the heterogeneity of the underlying satellite signal (brightness temperature here). Sea ice motion vectors calculated using ascending- and descending-only satellite tracks (with a true ~24 h time-scale) are compared with the widely-used combined product (ascending and descending tracks combined together, with an inherent ~39 h time-scale) This comparison reveals that kinematic parameters derived from the shorter time-scale velocity datasets are higher in magnitude than the combined. Sea ice motion is driven by 45 external oceanic and atmospheric forcing as well as internal stresses (Kottmeier and Sellmann, 1996). It is impacted by physical boundary conditions, e.g., coastline, icebergs, or ice tongues, as well as material properties, e.g., thickness, concentration, and strength (Heil et al, 2011). Sea ice deformation may change the drag between ocean and air (Spreen et al, 2017), as well as impacting the distribution of ice thickness and strength

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.