Abstract

<strong class="journal-contentHeaderColor">Abstract.</strong> As the changing climate expands the extent of arid and semi-arid lands, the number, severity of, and health effects associated with dust events are likely to increase. However, regulatory measurements capable of capturing dust (PM<sub>10</sub>, particulate matter smaller than 10 &micro;m in diameter) are sparse, sparser than measurements of PM<sub>2.5</sub> (PM smaller than 2.5 &micro;m in diameter). Although low-cost sensors could supplement regulatory monitors, as numerous studies have shown for PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration, most of these sensors are not effective at measuring PM<sub>10</sub> despite claims by sensor manufacturers. This study focuses on the Salt Lake Valley, adjacent to the Great Salt Lake, which recently reached historic lows exposing 1865 km<sup>2</sup> of dry lakebed. It evaluated the field performance of the Plantower PMS 5003, a common low-cost PM sensor, and the Alphasense OPC-N3, a promising candidate for low-cost measurement of PM<sub>10</sub>, against a federal equivalent method (FEM, beta attenuation) and research measurements (GRIMM aerosol spectrophotometer) at three different locations. During a month-long field study that included five dust events in the Salt Lake Valley with PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations reaching 311 &micro;g/m<sup>3</sup>, the OPC-N3 exhibited strong correlation with FEM PM<sub>10</sub> measurements (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.865, RMSE = 12.4 &micro;g/m<sup>3</sup>) and GRIMM (R<sup>2</sup>= 0.937, RMSE = 17.7 &micro;g/m<sup>3</sup>). The PMS sensor exhibited poor to moderate correlations (R<sup>2</sup>&lt;0.49, RMSE = 33&ndash;45 &micro;g/m<sup>3</sup>) with reference/research monitors and severely underestimated the PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations (slope &lt;0.099) for PM<sub>10</sub>. We also evaluated a PM-ratio-based correction method to improve the estimated PM<sub>10</sub> concentration from PMS sensors. After applying this method, PMS PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations correlated reasonably well with FEM measurements (R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.63) and GRIMM measurements (R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.76), and the RMSE decreased to 15&ndash;25 &micro;g/m<sup>3</sup>. Our results suggest that it may be possible to obtain better resolved spatial estimates of PM<sub>10</sub> concentration using a combination of PMS sensors (often publicly available in communities) and measurements of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>, such as those provided by FEMs, research-grade instrumentation, or the OPC-N3.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.