Abstract

Planktic foraminifera are widely used in palaeoceanographic and paleoclimatic studies. The accuracy of such reconstructions depends on our understanding of the organisms’ ecology. Here we report on field observations of planktic foraminiferal abundances (>150 µm) from 5 depth intervals between 0–500 m water depth at 37 sites in the eastern tropical Indian Ocean. The total planktic foraminiferal assemblage comprises 29 morphospecies; with 11 morphospecies accounting for ~90 % of the total assemblage. Both species composition and dominance in the net samples are broadly consistent with the published data from the corresponding surface sediments. The abundance and vertical distribution of planktic foraminifera are low offshore west Sumatra, and increase towards offshore south Java and the Lesser Sunda Islands (LSI). Average living depth of Trilobatus trilobus, Globigerinoides ruber, and Globigerina bulloides increases eastward, while that of Neogloboquadrina dutertrei, Pulleniatina obliquiloculata, and Globorotalia menardii remains constant. We interpret the overall zonal and vertical distribution patterns in planktic foraminiferal abundances as a response to the contrasting upper water column conditions during the southeast monsoon, i.e., oligotrophic and stratified offshore Sumatra (non-upwelling) vs. eutrophic and well-mixed offshore Java-LSI (upwelling). Overall, the inferred habitat depths of selected planktic foraminifera species show a good agreement with those from sediment trap samples and from surface sedimentss off Sumatra, but not with those from surface sediments off Java-LSI. The discrepancy might stem from the different temporal coverage of these sample types. Our findings highlight the need to consider how foraminiferal assemblages and ecology vary on shorter timescales, i.e., from “snapshots” of the water column captured by plankton net to seasonal and interannual variability as recorded in sediment traps and how these changes are transferred and preserved in deep-sea sediments.

Highlights

  • 20 Planktic foraminifera’s diversity, community composition, population dynamics as well as their shell chemistry are sensitive to hydrographic parameters of the upper ocean (Katz et al, 2010)

  • Seawater temperature has a large influence on the global distribution of 30 planktic foraminifera (Kucera, 2007, 2009), other parameters such as salinity, oxygen content, food availability, turbidity, and upwelling intensity can exert a strong control on the abundance, community structure, and vertical distribution of planktic foraminifera at regional scales (Anderson et al, 1979; Davis et al, 2021; Field, 2004; Lessa et al, 2020; Rebotim et al, 2017; Schiebel and Hemleben, 2017; Tolderlund et al, 1971)

  • It ranges between 0 to ∼72 meters of thickness and follows a similar spatial distribution as the MLDTEMP, with an average thickness of ∼45 m off Sumatra and ∼2 m off Java-Lesser Sunda Islands (LSI) (Table A1 and A2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

20 Planktic foraminifera’s diversity, community composition, population dynamics as well as their shell chemistry are sensitive to hydrographic parameters (e.g., temperature, salinity, food availability) of the upper ocean (Katz et al, 2010). Since the early observations from Murray (1897), many studies have evaluated the relationship between seawater tempera ture and planktic foraminiferal distribution, and found increasing dominance of cold species with increasing latitudes (Bauer, 1976; Bé and Hamlin, 1967; Eguchi et al, 1999). This relationship with seawater temperature allowed the development of the first comprehensive mapping of past sea surface temperature (CLIMAP Project Members, 1976). Seawater temperature has a large influence on the global distribution of 30 planktic foraminifera (Kucera, 2007, 2009), other parameters such as salinity, oxygen content, food availability, turbidity, and upwelling intensity can exert a strong control on the abundance, community structure, and vertical distribution of planktic foraminifera at regional scales (Anderson et al, 1979; Davis et al, 2021; Field, 2004; Lessa et al, 2020; Rebotim et al, 2017; Schiebel and Hemleben, 2017; Tolderlund et al, 1971)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call