Abstract

A new technique was used to directly measure O3 response to changes in precursor NOx and VOC concentrations in the atmosphere using three identical Teflon “smog chambers” equipped with UV lights. One chamber served as the baseline measurement for O3 formation, one chamber added NOx, and one chamber added surrogate VOCs (ethylene, m-xylene, n-hexane). Comparing the O3 formation between chambers over a three-hour UV cycle provides a direct measurement of O3 sensitivity to precursor concentrations. Measurements made with this system at Sacramento, California, between April 2020 – December 2020 revealed that the atmospheric chemical regime followed a seasonal cycle. O3 formation was VOC-limited (NOx – rich) during the early spring, transitioned to NOx-limited during the summer due to increased concentrations of ambient VOCs with high O3 formation potential, and then returned to VOC-limited (NOx-rich) during the fall season as the concentrations of ambient VOCs decreased and NOx increased. This seasonal pattern of O3 sensitivity is consistent with the cycle of biogenic emissions in California. The direct chamber O3 sensitivity measurements matched semi-direct measurements of HCHO / NO2 ratios from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) onboard the Sentinel-5 Precursor (Sentinel-5P) satellite. Furthermore, the satellite observations showed that the same seasonal cycle in O3 sensitivity occurred over most of the entire state of California, with only the urban cores of the very large cities remaining VOC-limited across all seasons. Looking at the entire measurement period, days with baseline chamber O3 concentrations above 90 ppb had median O3 sensitivity that was NOx-limited, suggesting that a NOx emissions control strategy would be most effective at reducing these peak O3 concentrations. In contrast, days with O3 concentrations below 80 ppb had median O3 sensitivity that was VOC-limited, suggesting that an emissions control strategy focusing on NOx reduction would increase O3 concentrations. VOC controls on these intermediate days would be difficult, however, if biogenic VOCs account for the majority of the O3 formation. This challenging situation suggests that emissions control programs that focus on NOx reductions will immediately lower peak O3 concentrations, but slightly increase intermediate O3 concentrations until NOx levels fall far enough to re-enter the NOx-limited regime. The spatial pattern of increasing and decreasing O3 concentrations in response to a NOx emissions control strategy should be carefully mapped in order to fully understand the public health implications.

Highlights

  • Measurements made with this system at Sacramento, California, between April 2020 – December 2020 revealed that the atmospheric chemical regime followed a seasonal 20 cycle

  • Comparing the ground-based chamber measurements to satellite measurements from TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) suggests that the transition between NOx-limited and volatile organic compounds (VOCs)-limited chemical regimes for O3 formation occurs at a TROPOMI HCHO/NO2 ratio of 4.6

  • Monthly-averaged TROPOMI measurements show that O3 sensitivity across most of 495 California follows a seasonal cycle similar to Sacramento, but locations with higher population density are more VOClimited

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ground-level ozone (O3) is an oxidant that inflames airways and damages tissue in the respiratory tract leading to 40 increased coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath, and other asthmatic symptoms (US EPA, 2020b). Multiple factors have been proposed to explain these increasing O3 concentrations 55 including (i) growing importance of precursor VOC emissions not previously accounted for in the planning process as major sources such as transportation have been controlled (McDonald et al, 2018; Shah et al, 2020), (ii) an imbalance in the historical degree of NOx and VOC reductions (Cox et al, 2013; Steiner et al, 2006), or (iii) the consequences of climate change (Jacob and Winner, 2009; Jing et al, 2017; Pusede et al, 2015; Rasmussen et al, 2013; Weaver et al, 2009). The uncertainty that lingers over the recent O3 trends suggests that fresh approaches are needed to directly verify the optimum emissions control path

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.