Reply by Authors

Abstract

No AccessJournal of UrologyLetter to the Editor/Errata1 Jul 2011Reply by Authors View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.168AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Reply by Authors." The Journal of Urology, 186(1), pp. 351–352 References 1 : Radical prostatectomy: is the perineal approach more difficult to learn?. J Urol1997; 157: 230. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Incisions do not simply sum. Surg Endosc2010; 24: 1746. Google Scholar 3 : Determinants of long-term sexual health outcome after radical prostatectomy measured by a validated instrument. J Urol2003; 169: 1453. Link, Google Scholar 4 : Effect of a large prostate gland on open and robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int2008; 101: 1140. Google Scholar 5 : The impact of prostate size, median lobe, and prior benign prostatic hyperplasia intervention on robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: techniques and outcomes. Eur Urol2011; 59: 595. Google Scholar 6 : Outpatient radical prostatectomy: impact of standard perineal approach on patient outcome. J Urol2001; 166: 581. Link, Google Scholar 7 : Dorsal vein complex control after apical dissection results in low apical positive surgical margins, but other surgical maneuvers are required to optimize early continence recovery. Eur Urol2011; 59: 222. Google Scholar 8 : Complete periprostatic anatomy preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP): the new pubovesical complex-sparing technique. Eur Urol2010; 58: 407. Google Scholar © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 186Issue 1July 2011Page: 351-352 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...