Abstract

Most cancers have lost a critical DNA damage response (DDR) pathway during tumor evolution. These alterations provide a useful explanation for the initial sensitivity of tumors to DNA-targeting chemotherapy. A striking example is dysfunctional homology-directed repair (HDR), e.g., due to inactivating mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Extensive efforts are being made to develop novel targeted therapies exploiting such an HDR defect. Inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) are an instructive example of this approach. Despite the success of PARP inhibitors, the presence of primary or acquired therapy resistance remains a major challenge in clinical oncology. To move the field of precision medicine forward, we need to understand the precise mechanisms causing therapy resistance. Using preclinical models, various mechanisms underlying chemotherapy resistance have been identified. Restoration of HDR seems to be a prevalent mechanism but this does not explain resistance in all cases. Interestingly, some factors involved in DNA damage response (DDR) have independent functions in replication fork (RF) biology and their loss causes RF instability and therapy sensitivity. However, in BRCA-deficient tumors, loss of these factors leads to restored stability of RFs and acquired drug resistance. In this review we discuss the recent advances in the field of RF biology and its potential implications for chemotherapy response in DDR-defective cancers. Additionally, we review the role of DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathways in maintenance of genome integrity and their alterations in cancer. Furthermore, we refer to novel tools that, combined with a better understanding of drug resistance mechanisms, may constitute a great advance in personalized diagnosis and therapeutic strategies for patients with HDR-deficient tumors.

Highlights

  • DNA Fiber AssayIn this procedure, ongoing replication events are sequentially labeled with two thymidine analogs [commonly iododeoxyuridine (IdU) and chlorodeoxyuridine (CldU)] and, after cell lysis, individual DNA molecules are stretched into fibers using the combing [75, 76] or the spreading technique (represented in Figure 1B) [77]

  • Reviewed by: Zhi-Xiang Xu, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States Alvaro Galli, Italian National Research Council, Italy

  • The other pathways, classical non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and theta-mediated end joining (TMEJ) do not require a template for repair and tend to be error-prone, homologous recombination (HR) occurs after DNA replication and uses the undamaged sister chromatid as a template for error-free repair of double strand breaks (DSBs) [reviewed in [9, 11]]

Read more

Summary

DNA Fiber Assay

In this procedure, ongoing replication events are sequentially labeled with two thymidine analogs [commonly iododeoxyuridine (IdU) and chlorodeoxyuridine (CldU)] and, after cell lysis, individual DNA molecules are stretched into fibers using the combing [75, 76] or the spreading technique (represented in Figure 1B) [77]. IPOND is an approach focused on the detection of proteins associated with nascent DNA In this method, cells are incubated with the thymidine analog 5Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) to label newly replicated DNA. After cell lysis and sonication to shear chromatin, proteins in close proximity to biotin and EdU-labeled DNA are purified with streptavidin-coated agarose beads. These isolated proteins are resolved by Western blotting or mass spectrometry

DNA fiber assay
REPLICATION FORK REVERSAL AND ITS PLAYERS
DNA translocase
Chromatin remodeler
MECHANISMS OF FORK RESTART
DNA DAMAGE TOLERANCE PATHWAYS
ALTERATIONS OF DDT PATHWAYS IN
THERAPY RESPONSE
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call