Abstract

BackgroundDesigned in 2012 with a first implementation in 2013, NE STEM 4U is a professional development program for post-secondary students/undergraduates, and serves as a source of outreach, content knowledge generation, and STEM literacy for youth in grades kindergarten through 8th grade (ages 5–14). The model empowers post-secondary students as facilitators of inquiry-based learning within the context of an out-of-school time program. This study investigated the potential for replicating or ‘franchising’ this model by evaluating on the following: (1) Is the model replicable? And, if so, (2) what core elements are necessary for program fidelity? And (3) is there a dependency on a particular setting/participant type (e.g., a more rural or urban setting)?ResultsStrategic expansion of the program to different institutional types (i.e., Research 1, Research II, and a predominantly undergraduate institution), different geographical locations (i.e., rural and urban), and with various school district partners (i.e., large and small) determined that program fidelity and replicability required 4 core elements or criteria: (i) intentional programming, (ii) staff quality, (iii) effective partnerships, and (iv) program evaluation and continuous improvement. Importantly, we examined emergent themes by each site, as well as in combination (n = 16 focus group participants, n = 12 reflection surveys). These data indicated that Flexibility (21.22%), Student Engagement (i.e., Youth) (19.53%), Classroom Management (i.e., also pertaining to youth) (19.31%), and Communication (15.71%) were the themes most referenced by the post-secondary student mentors in the NE STEM 4U program, regardless of site. Finally, the YPQA results demonstrate general replication of program quality in a “franchise” location.ConclusionsThese results highlight the core elements of the NE STEM 4U program for consideration of expansion (through strategic replication or ‘franchising’) as a possible international model. The findings and voices highlight the program’s trajectory toward success into environments that expand professional development for post-secondary students, and for delivering STEM opportunities for youth.

Highlights

  • In the race for talent, all components of the workforce require access to highly skilled students earlier and earlier in their educational pathways (Camilli & Hira, 2019)

  • We examined these emergent themes by each site, as well as in combination (n = 16 focus group participants, n = 12 reflection surveys). These data indicated that Flexibility (21.22%), Student Engagement (i.e., Youth) (19.53%), Classroom Management (19.31%), and Communication (15.71%) were the themes most referenced by the post-secondary student mentors in the NE STEM Nebraska Science (4U) program, regardless of site (Fig. 1, Table 3)

  • Synthesis of the research on the model of replication Through our assessment of NE STEM 4U we have identified four core elements of franchise success: (1) Intentional Programming, (2) Staff Quality, (3) Effective Partnerships, and (4) Program Evaluation and Improvement

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the race for talent, all components of the workforce require access to highly skilled students earlier and earlier in their educational pathways (Camilli & Hira, 2019). Retention in STEM programs is not an easy institutional task; despite an emphasis on retention in higher education, many post-secondary students struggle to complete a degree in STEM fields (American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2011; Dolan, 2017; Eddy & Hogan, 2014; Egenrieder, 2010; Gottesman & Hoskins, 2013). If students decide that STEM fields are not for them, it is much more challenging to change their minds (Harrison et al, 2011; Husserl, 1913/1983; Hutchinson-Anderson et al, 2015; Maltese and Tai, 2011; Sithole et al, 2017; UNO Advantage [UNO], 2021) Other factors, such as the cost of higher education, may present challenges to families seeking to support and mentor college students (especially first-generation college students; NAS, 2016a, 2016b). This study investigated the potential for replicating or ‘franchising’ this model by evaluating on the following: (1) Is the model replicable? And, if so, (2) what core elements are necessary for program fidelity? And (3) is there a dependency on a particular setting/participant type (e.g., a more rural or urban setting)?

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call