Abstract
AbstractAre share units a better compensation tool than stock options? This paper studies the impact of a transition within the compensation structures of CEOs of companies listed on the TSX Composite Index. Specifically, we ask whether replacing options with units‐based compensation reduces the volatility of these companies' stock prices while promoting better returns. Our findings show that a shift to share units reduces large‐cap Canadian companies' total risk through its idiosyncratic component. This transition is also accompanied by an increase in their risk‐adjusted accounting and market performance. This suggests that share units are better for compensation contracts.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
