Abstract
The argument of [2] is not correct. Specifically, Lemma 7 does not appear to be true in general. It does not seem worthwhile to publish a corrected version of the proof, since Friedman and Scedrov [1], using a somewhat related argument, have now succeeded in proving the full theorem which eluded me. In the notation of [2], they show that ZFdoes not have the set existence property and therefore that ZFI does not imply the collection axiom.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
