Abstract

The debilitating effects of muscle damage, either through ischemic injury or volumetric muscle loss (VML), can have significant impacts on patients, and yet there are few effective treatments. This challenge arises when function is degraded due to significant amounts of skeletal muscle loss, beyond the regenerative ability of endogenous repair mechanisms. Currently available surgical interventions for VML are quite invasive and cannot typically restore function adequately. In response to this, many new bioengineering studies implicate 3D bioprinting as a viable option. Bioprinting for VML repair includes three distinct phases: printing and seeding, growth and maturation, and implantation and application. Although this 3D bioprinting technology has existed for several decades, the advent of more advanced and novel printing techniques has brought us closer to clinical applications. Recent studies have overcome previous limitations in diffusion distance with novel microchannel construct architectures and improved myotubule alignment with highly biomimetic nanostructures. These structures may also enhance angiogenic and nervous ingrowth post-implantation, though further research to improve these parameters has been limited. Inclusion of neural cells has also shown to improve myoblast maturation and development of neuromuscular junctions, bringing us one step closer to functional, implantable skeletal muscle constructs. Given the current state of skeletal muscle 3D bioprinting, the most pressing future avenues of research include furthering our understanding of the physical and biochemical mechanisms of myotube development and expanding our control over macroscopic and microscopic construct structures. Further to this, current investigation needs to be expanded from immunocompromised rodent and murine myoblast models to more clinically applicable human cell lines as we move closer to viable therapeutic implementation.

Highlights

  • Volumetric muscle loss (VML), defined as the loss of more than 20% of skeletal muscle, destroys innate repair mechanisms and renders muscle tissue incapable of self-healing.[1]

  • Bioinks offer a more homogenous cell distribution when compared to post-print seeding, which can result in localization of cells to the surface,[55] making bioinks more beneficial for the growth of 3D skeletal muscle constructs

  • Further consideration needs to be placed in bioreactor systems capable of supporting these complex cells and structures to allow for the full maturation of a skeletal muscle construct

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Volumetric muscle loss (VML), defined as the loss of more than 20% of skeletal muscle, destroys innate repair mechanisms and renders muscle tissue incapable of self-healing.[1]. It is believed that the loss of local satellite cell populations and basal lamina in VML injuries prevents endogenous mechanisms from replacing lost tissue.[2] VML injuries frequently suffer from a loss of vascularization, resulting in ischemia, which favors the formation of fibrotic tissue and limits functional restoration.[3] Current treatments typically involve debridement of fibrotic tissue and insertion of autologous muscle grafts to promote muscle repair, followed by physical therapy. The array of bioinks, printing technologies, and techniques surrounding construct implantation and survivability have massively expanded in recent years, offering new opportunities to fine-tune construct biochemical properties, creating improved patient outcomes. 3D bioprinting for VML repair is a complex multidisciplinary process, composed of three key phases: printing and seeding, growth and maturation, and implantation and application. Every new study elucidates the current limitations and gaps in knowledge, paving the way for future studies and strengthening our current understanding of the biochemical processes underpinning muscle tissue development and restoration

Biofabrication
Micropatterning
Extrusion bioprinting
Multimodal printing
Multimaterial printing
Bioink properties
Construct architecture
Seeding constructs and bioreactors
Growth mediators and cell selection
Vascularization
Innervation
Myotubule elongation and maturation
Immunological considerations and degradation
Current successes
Findings
FUTURE CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call