Abstract
A collection of 40 Brucella strains, including 19 clinical B.canis isolates, was analyzed using ERIC-PCR and REP-PCR. PCR amplification using primers REP 1R-I and REP 2-I provided distinct patterns for Brucella spp. All Brucella strains could be discriminated at least to the species level. ERIC-PCR, employing ERIC 1R and ERIC 2 as primers was less discriminative for Brucella, only allowing a discrimination to the genus level with occasional discrimination between individual strains. It can be concluded that rep PCR is a promising fingerprinting method for the evaluation of an outbreak.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
