Abstract

The current study investigated the cerebral basis of word perceptual repetition priming with fMRI during a letter detection task that manipulated the familiarity of perceptual word form and the number of repetitions. Some neuroimaging studies have reported increases, instead of decreases, in brain activations (called “repetition enhancement”) associated with repetition priming of unfamiliar stimuli which have been interpreted as the creation of new perceptual representations for unfamiliar items. According to this interpretation, several repetitions of unfamiliar items would then be necessary for the repetition priming to occur, a hypothesis not explicitly tested in prior studies. In the present study, using a letter detection task on briefly flashed words, we explored the effect of familiarity on brain response for word visual perceptual priming using both words with usual (i.e., familiar) and unusual (i.e., unfamiliar) font, presented up to four times for stimuli with unusual font. This allows potential changes in the brain responses for unfamiliar items to be assessed over several repetitions, i.e., repetition enhancement to suppression. Our results reveal significant increases of activity in the bilateral occipital areas related to repetition of words in both familiar and unfamiliar conditions. Our findings support the sharpening hypothesis, showing a lack of cerebral economy with repetition when the task requires the processing of all word features, whatever the familiarity of the material, and emphasize the influence of the nature of stimuli processing on its neuronal manifestation.

Highlights

  • Priming is generally defined as an improvement or a change in the identification, production or classification of a stimulus as a result of a prior encounter with the same or a similar stimulus (Tulving and Schacter, 1990; Schacter and Buckner, 1998; Wiggs and Martin, 1998; Henson, 2003; Schacter et al, 2007)

  • Repetition-related reductions associated with perceptual behavioral priming were reported in brain areas that are significantly active for novel items, and that are known to be involved in early

  • Repetition increases rather than decreases of brain responses, called “repetition enhancement”, have been associated with repetition priming of unfamiliar stimuli such as novel 3D objects (Schacter et al, 1995), non-real objects (Soldan et al, 2008, 2010), unknown faces (Henson et al, 2000; Thiel et al, 2002), meaningless symbols (Henson et al, 2000) and pseudowords (Henson, 2001; Fiebach et al, 2005; Gagnepain et al, 2008, 2011)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Priming is generally defined as an improvement or a change in the identification, production or classification of a stimulus as a result of a prior encounter with the same or a similar stimulus (Tulving and Schacter, 1990; Schacter and Buckner, 1998; Wiggs and Martin, 1998; Henson, 2003; Schacter et al, 2007). Perceptual repetition priming is often assessed using identification tasks of degraded items or briefly flashed stimuli which are supposed to further solicit the perceptual memory (Brown et al, 1996; Berry et al, 1997; Lebreton et al, 2001; Gagnepain et al, 2008, 2011) This repetition-based processing facilitation has been associated with reductions in neural activity when an experience is repeated. Several functional neuroimaging studies have consistently revealed a decrease in haemodynamic responses for repeated (primed) relative to unrepeated (unprimed) stimuli This repetition-based neural change has been assigned numerous terms such as adaptation, repetition suppression or neural priming (for review see Grill-Spector et al, 2006), and has been observed within a set of specific cortical regions (Schacter et al, 1998, 2004, 2007; Schacter and Badgaiyan, 2001; Henson, 2003), depending on the type of stimulus Repetition-related reductions associated with perceptual behavioral priming were reported in brain areas that are significantly active for novel items (or for the first presentation of item), and that are known to be involved in early

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call