Abstract

Ishigami and Klein (2010) showed that scores of the three attention networks (alerting, orienting, and executive control) measured with the two versions of the Attention Network Test (ANT; Fan et al., 2002; Callejas et al., 2005) were robust over 10 sessions of repeated testing even though practice effects were consistently observed especially in the executive network when young adults were tested. The current study replicated their method to examine robustness, stability, reliability, and isolability of the networks scores when older adults were tested with these ANTs. Ten test sessions, each containing two versions of the ANT, were administered to 10 older adults. Participants were asked to indicate the direction of a target arrow, flanked by distractors, presented either above or below the fixation following auditory signals or/and visual cue. Network scores were calculated using orthogonal subtractions of performance in selected conditions. All network scores remained highly significant even after nine previous sessions despite some practice effects in the executive and the alerting networks. Some lack of independence among the networks was found. The relatively poor reliability of network scores with one session of data rises to respectable levels as more data is added.

Highlights

  • Posner and Petersen (1990) proposed three networks of attention – alerting, orienting, and executive control

  • Replicating the method used by Ishigami and Klein (2010), the objective of the current study is to examine the stability, robustness, and reliability of the attention networks derived from both versions of the Attention Network Test (ANT) over repeated testing in older adults

  • ANT For each participant, trials with improper responses or trials with no responses were excluded (2.0%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Posner and Petersen (1990) proposed three networks of attention – alerting, orienting, and executive control. These networks are defined in anatomical and functional terms by finding correspondence between areas of activation in the brain and in performance on attention tasks that measure different functions of attention. Alerting involves a change in mental state as well as in physiological state, and prepares the organism for fast reactions. These changes follow the presentation of a signal that provides information that a task-relevant event will occur soon (Posner, 1978). The anterior cingulate and prefrontal areas have been associated with this function (e.g., Bush et al, 2000; Casey et al, 2000; MacDonald et al, 2000)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call