Abstract

Chlorpyrifos (CPF), an organophosphorus pesticide (OP), is one of the most widely used pesticides in the world. Subchronic exposures to CPF that do not cause cholinergic crisis are associated with problems in cognitive function (i.e., learning and memory deficits), but the biological mechanism(s) underlying this association remain speculative. To identify potential mechanisms of subchronic CPF neurotoxicity, adult male Long Evans (LE) rats were administered CPF at 3 or 10mg/kg/d (s.c.) for 21 days. We quantified mRNA and non-coding RNA (ncRNA) expression profiles by RNA-seq, microarray analysis and small ncRNA sequencing technology in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Hippocampal slice immunohistochemistry was used to determine CPF-induced changes in protein expression and localization patterns. Neither dose of CPF caused overt clinical signs of cholinergic toxicity, although after 21 days of exposure, cholinesterase activity was decreased to 58% or 13% of control levels in the hippocampus of rats in the 3 or 10mg/kg/d groups, respectively. Differential gene expression in the CA1 region of the hippocampus was observed only in the 10mg/kg/d dose group relative to controls. Of the 1382 differentially expressed genes identified by RNA-seq and microarray analysis, 67 were common to both approaches. Differential expression of six of these genes (Bdnf, Cort, Crhbp, Nptx2, Npy and Pnoc) was verified in an independent CPF exposure study; immunohistochemistry demonstrated that CRHBP and NPY were elevated in the CA1 region of the hippocampus at 10mg/kg/d CPF. Gene ontology enrichment analysis suggested association of these genes with receptor-mediated cell survival signaling pathways. miR132/212 was also elevated in the CA1 hippocampal region, which may play a role in the disruption of neurotrophin-mediated cognitive processes after CPF administration. These findings identify potential mediators of CPF-induced neurobehavioral deficits following subchronic exposure to CPF at a level that inhibits hippocampal cholinesterase to less than 20% of control. An equally significant finding is that subchronic exposure to CPF at a level that produces more moderate inhibition of hippocampal cholinesterase (approximately 50% of control) does not produce a discernable change in gene expression.

Highlights

  • Organophosphorus (OP) pesticides are among the most widely used pesticides in the world

  • OP poisoning is diagnosed by measuring butyrylcholinesterase activity in the plasma or acetylcholinesterase activity in whole blood, the relative degree of inhibition varies with various pesticides (Eddleston et al, 2008)

  • All animals survived to necropsy at 21 days, and there were no clinical signs of acute cholinergic crisis observed among the animals in the study during the 21 day treatment period

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Organophosphorus (OP) pesticides are among the most widely used pesticides in the world. OP (acute) poisoning is diagnosed by measuring butyrylcholinesterase activity in the plasma or acetylcholinesterase activity in whole blood, the relative degree of inhibition varies with various pesticides (Eddleston et al, 2008). Whole blood acetylcholinesterase activity inhibition correlates with clinical features of OP toxicity (Eddleston et al, 2008), which is primarily caused by hyperstimulation of cholinergic receptors (Fukuto, 1990). Many factors play a role in OP toxicity (e.g., dose, duration and frequency of exposure, host response and susceptibility factors), Rohlman et al (2011) found that most studies anchored neurobehavioral test performance to a measure of duration of exposure, urinary metabolite (exposure) or ChE activity (effect). A range of adverse effects were noted in eight major domains of neurobehavioral functioning (Rohlman et al, 2011), including sustained attention (Rothlein et al, 2006; Rohlman et al, 2007), deficits in attention/short-term memory (Abdel Rasoul et al, 2008), memory (Farahat et al, 2003; Roldan-Tapia et al, 2005; Eckerman et al, 2007), and perception (Abdel Rasoul et al, 2008)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.