Abstract

Repeated arterial injury, because it challenges already activated cells, may elicit a reaction that differs from that provoked by a single injury. We compared the response of rat aorta to single and double balloon injury and tested the inhibitory effect of heparin in both situations. For repeated injury, the first and second lesions were induced 3 weeks apart. Two weeks after repeated injury, the neointima that existed from the first lesion had expanded, with significant increases in intima-media wet weight and its DNA and elastin content and in the intima-to-media (I/M) thickness ratio. Two days after repeated injury, the expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) was enhanced in both the media and the intima, indicating that cells from both layers are involved in the aortic response to a second lesion. As established previously, treatment with heparin (continuous intravenous administration, 50 IU/kg.h-1) almost totally suppressed the response to single injury. However, heparin only attenuated the response to repeated injury, with a partial decrease in intima-media wet weight and its DNA and elastin content and in I/M thickness ratio. PCNA labeling showed that heparin inhibited the proliferative activity in medial cells much more strongly than in intimal cells. In conclusion, repeated aortic injury elicits a reaction of both the media and preexisting neointima. In this mixed response, neointimal smooth muscle cells are less sensitive than medial cells to inhibition by heparin, which results in a weakened effect of the drug on the fibromuscular reaction.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.