Abstract

Individuals seem to differ in conditionability, i.e., the ease by which the contingent presentation of two stimuli will lead to a conditioned response. In contemporary learning theory, individual differences in the etiology and maintenance of anxiety disorders are, among others, explained by individual differences in temperamental variables (Mineka and Zinbarg, 2006). One such individual difference variable is how people process a learning experience when the conditioning stimuli are no longer present. Repeatedly thinking about the conditioning experience, as in worry or rumination, might prolong the initial (fear) reactions and as such, might leave certain individuals more vulnerable to developing an anxiety disorder. However, in human conditioning research, relatively little attention has been devoted to the processing of a memory trace after its initial acquisition, despite its potential influences on subsequent performance. Post-acquisition processing can be induced by mental reiteration of a conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus (CS-US)-contingency. Using a human conditioned suppression paradigm, we investigated the effect of repeated activations of a CS-US-contingency memory on the level of conditioned responding at a later test. Results of three experiments showed more sustained responding to a “rehearsed” CS+ as compared to a “non-rehearsed” CS+. Moreover, the second experiment showed no effect of rehearsal when only the CS was rehearsed instead of the CS-US-contingency. The third experiment demonstrated that mental CS-US-rehearsal has the same effect regardless of whether it was cued by the CS and a verbal reference to the US or by a neutral signal, making the rehearsal “purely mental.” In sum, it was demonstrated that post-acquisition activation of a CS-US-contingency memory can impact conditioned responding, underlining the importance of post-acquisition processes in conditioning. This might indicate that individuals who are more prone to mentally rehearse information condition more easily.

Highlights

  • In classical conditioning, a learning experience is often considered to end when the conditioning stimuli are no longer present

  • Experiment 1 was set up to test whether repeated activation of a previously acquired conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus (CS-unconditioned stimulus (US))-contingency memory impacts conditioning effects to that CS in the long-term

  • The results clearly show stronger conditioned responding to the rehearsed CS+ as compared to the non-rehearsed CS+, indicating that mental reiteration of a CS-US-experience strengthens subsequent conditioned responding

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A learning experience is often considered to end when the conditioning stimuli are no longer present This is based on the fact that conditioning refers to the contingent presentation of an originally neutral stimulus (conditioned stimulus, CS) together with a biologically relevant unconditioned stimulus (US), resulting in the CS becoming a signal for US-onset and evoking a conditioned response (CR) during subsequent presentations (Bouton, 2007). In the case of Pavlovian conditioning, human participants may mentally reflect upon the conditioning experience by repeatedly reactivating either the CS-representation, the US-representation, or the entire experience (CS-US-contingency memory) This repeated thinking about a negative experience might be akin to repetitive thought processes such as worry and rumination, as will be discussed in more detail shortly. The current research aimed to investigate the role of individual differences in such repetitive thought on the strength of conditioned responding

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call