Repeatability vs. multiple-trait models to evaluate shell dynamic stiffness for layer chickens.

Abstract

Shell quality is one of the most important traits for improvement in layer chickens. Proper consideration of repeated records can increase the accuracy of estimated breeding values and thus genetic improvement of shell quality. The objective of this study was to compare different models for genetic evaluation of the collected data. For this study, 81,646 dynamic stiffness records on 21,321 brown egg layers and 93,748 records on 24,678 white egg layers from 4 generations were analyzed. Across generations, data were collected at 2 to 4 ages (at approximately 26, 42, 65, and 86 wk), with repeated records at each age. Seven models were compared, including 5 repeatability models with increasing complexity, a random regression model, and a multitrait model. The models were compared using Akaike Information Criteria with significance testing of nested models with a Log Likelihood Ratio test. Estimates of heritability were 0.31-0.36 for the brown line and 0.23-0.26 for the white line, but repeatability was higher for the model with age-specific permanent environment effects (0.59 for both lines) than for the model with an overall permanent environmental effects (0.47 for the brown and 0.41 for the white line). The model that allowed for permanent environmental effect within age and heterogeneous residual variance between ages resulted in improved fit compared to the traditional model that fits single permanent environment and residual effects, but was inferior in fit and predictive ability to the full multiple-trait model. The random regression model had better fit to the data than repeatability models but slightly worse than the multiple-trait model. For traits with repeated records at different ages, repeatability within and across ages as well as genetic correlations should be considered while choosing the number of records collected per individual as well as the model for genetic evaluation.