Repeatability, Reproducibility and Sources of Variability in the Assessment of Backscatter Coefficient and Texture Parameters from High-Frequency Ultrasound Acquisitions in Human Median Nerve.

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) is an increasingly prevalent and effective diagnostic modality for neuromuscular imaging. Gray-scale B-mode imaging has been the dominant US approach to evaluating nerves qualitatively or making morphometric measurements of nerves, providing important insights into pathological changes for conditions such as carpal tunnel syndrome. Among more recent ultrasound strategies, high-frequency ultrasound (often defined as >15 MHz for clinical applications), quantitative ultrasound and image textural analysis offer promising enhancements for improved and more objective approaches to nerve imaging. In this study, we evaluated the repeatability and reproducibility of backscatter coefficient (BSC) and imaging texture features extracted by gray-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCMs) in homogeneous tissue-mimicking reference phantoms and in median nerves in the wrists of healthy participants. We also investigated several practical sources of variability in the assessment of quantitative parameters, including influences of operators, and participant-to-participant variability. Overall, BSC- and GLCM-based outcomes are highly repeatable and reproducible after operator training, based on measurement of descriptive statistics, repeatability coefficient (RC) and reproducibility coefficient recommended by Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA RDC). GLCM parameters appear more reproducible and repeatable than BSC-based parameters in healthy participants in vivo. However, such variability noted here must be compared with the value ranges and variability of the results in pathological nerves, including median nerves afflicted by trauma, overuse syndromes such as carpal tunnel syndrome and after surgical repair.