Abstract

Migratory birds are often faithful to wintering (nonbreeding) sites, and also migration timing is usually remarkably consistent, that is, highly repeatable. Spatiotemporal repeatability can be of advantage for multiple reasons, including familiarity with local resources and predators as well as avoiding the costs of finding a new place, for example, nesting grounds. However, when the environment is variable in space and time, variable site selection and timing might be more rewarding. To date, studies on spatial and temporal repeatability in short‐lived long‐distance migrants are scarce, most notably of first‐time and subsequent migrations. Here, we investigated repeatability in autumn migration directions, wintering sites, and annual migration timing in Hoopoes (Upupa epops), a long‐distance migrant, using repeated tracks of adult and first‐time migrants. Even though autumn migration directions were mostly the same, individual wintering sites often changed from year to year with distances between wintering sites exceeding 1,000 km. The timing of migration was repeatable within an individual during autumn, but not during spring migration. We suggest that Hoopoes respond to variable environmental conditions such as north–south shifts in rainfall during winter and differing onset of the food availability during spring migration.

Highlights

  • Many bird species are faithful to their breeding grounds (Greenwood, 1980)

  • We investigated the repeatability of autumn migration directions, migration timing in autumn and spring, and the location of wintering sites in subsequent migrations in a near-­passerine: the Hoopoe (Upupa epops) using geolocator data of both first-­time and adult migrants

  • To investigate autumn migration directions, migration timing, and wintering sites, birds were equipped with geolocators of type SOI-­GDL1 (Bächler et al, 2010)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Many bird species are faithful to their breeding grounds (Greenwood, 1980). Site fidelity can be advantageous because of familiarity with local resources and predators (Greenwood, 1980; Part, 1991; Piper, 2011) while searching for a new site may cost energy and increase predation risk (Yoder, Marschall, & Swanson, 2004). Migrants can show consistent annual timing, for example, a high repeatability of arrival time in the wintering grounds, especially when site fidelity is high (Conklin, Battley, & Potter, 2013; Vardanis et al, 2011) Birds that adopt such spatially and temporally repeatable migrations often depend on particular resources that are exclusively available at specific places and times. Other migrating species rely on resources whose availability varies over time and space such as insects (Andersson, 1980; Schlossberg, 2009) Their best strategy would be to adopt a temporally and spatially flexible migration strategy responding to. We investigated the repeatability of autumn migration directions, migration timing in autumn and spring, and the location of wintering sites in subsequent migrations in a near-­passerine: the Hoopoe (Upupa epops) using geolocator data of both first-­time and adult migrants

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call