Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the repeatability of macular thickness measurements using time domain (TD) OCT and spectral domain (SD) OCT in diabetic macular edema. Methods: In 42 eyes of 42 patients with diabetic macular edema, three consecutive macular measurements were performed with TD OCT and SD OCT, and measurements for macular thickness and total macular volume obtained by the two OCTs were compared. The within-subject standard deviation (Sw), coefficient of variation (CVw), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to assess repeatability, with agreement between measurements assessed with Bland Altman plots. The correlations were also evaluated via the Pearson‘s correlation coefficient. Results: The Sw of TD OCT and SD OCT for foveal thickness, total macular volume were 29.67 m/16.44 m, 1.26 /0.23 , respectively, and were significantly lower in SD OCT. The ranges of the respective CVw and ICC values were 1.10-2.78%, 0.780.96 for TD OCT, and 0.290.94%, 0.920.99 for SD OCT. The SD OCT showed better repeatability for macular thickness measurements (all p0.001). The 95% limits of agreement for foveal and total macular volume were 88.9 m, 2.4 , respectively. The Pearson‘s correlation coefficients of macular thickness and total macular volume between the two OCT methods were statistically significant (p=0.88-0.99). Conclusions: Although both OCTs proved reliable for macular thickness measurements in diabetic macular edema, SD OCT shows better repeatability than TD OCT. Although macular thickness measurements obtained from the two OCTs cannot be used interchangeably, there were statistically significant correlations between measurements obtained using the two OCTs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.