Abstract

To determine factors influencing penetrating corneal graft survival in patients receiving repeat grafts in the same eye after a failed first graft for keratoconus. Large cohort study from a national register of corneal grafts, in which data were recorded prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Follow-up extended to 23 years. Follow-up was available for 229 regrafts performed in 177 eyes of 173 patients. Regrafts were performed more than once in 16 eyes. Corneal graft survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival plots and Cox proportional hazards regression, clustered by patient. Graft survival. Graft survival was significantly worse (P<0.001) for second (n = 176) and third or greater grafts (n = 20), compared with first grafts for keratoconus (n = 4871). Kaplan-Meier survivals at 1, 5, and 15 years postgrafting were 88%, 69%, and 46% for second grafts, and 65%, 49%, and 33% for third and subsequent grafts, respectively (P<0.001). Risk factors associated with graft failure of repeat grafts in multivariate analysis were the geographic location of surgery ("center"; P = 0.04), failure of the previous graft within 10 years of surgery (P = 0.02), recipient age at graft ≥60 years (P = 0.04), occurrence of rejection episodes (P = 0.007), and corneal neovascularization postoperatively (P = 0.007). Repeat corneal grafts in eyes originally grafted for keratoconus showed better survival when the previous graft had survived ≥10 years, surgery was performed at a favorable location, the recipient was <60 years old at grafting, and graft rejection and neovascularization were circumvented. The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.