Repeat coronary angioplasty: Efficacy of a third angioplasty for a second restenosis

Abstract

To determine the efficacy of repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, 74 patients were studied who underwent a third angioplasty for a second restenosis of one coronary artery segment. The procedure was successful in 93% of patients. Procedural complications included emergency bypass surgery (three patients) and in-hospital death (two patients). At late follow-up (mean 18 months, range 7 to 49), 30 patients (43%) had a third restenosis treated with either a fourth angioplasty (16 patients), coronary bypass surgery (11 patients) or medical management (1 patient). Thirty-nine patients (57%) had no restenosis on the basis of follow-up angiography or absence of symptoms previously attributed to restenosis. Factors associated with a third restenosis included a shorter time interval (<3 months) between previous angioplasty procedures and dilation of the left anterior descending coronary artery.Among the 16 patients undergoing a fourth angioplasty for a third restenosis, the procedural success rate was 94%. One patient required emergency bypass surgery. At late follow-up (mean 16 months, range 7 to 38), eight patients (53%) had a fourth restenosis treated with either a fifth angioplasty (one patient), bypass surgery (five patients) or medical management (two patients).Considering all 74 patients undergoing a third angioplasty for a second restenosis, 27% had bypass surgery, 5% died, 4% were managed medically and 64% were free of angina at late follow-up after either a third, fourth or fifth angioplasty.Restenosis rates after a third or fourth angioplasty procedure for recurrent restenosis are higher than those for the initial procedures. The rate of restenosis after the third and fourth dilation is approximately 50%. However, in this study, multiple repeat angioplasty procedures provided effective long-term therapy for 64% of patients presenting with a second restenosis.