Abstract

IntroductionBiological and synthetic laminar absorbable prostheses are available for the repair of hernia defects in the abdominal wall. They share the important feature of being gradually degraded in the host, resulting in place the formation of a neotissue. This study was designed to assess the host tissue’s incorporation of collagen bioprostheses and a synthetic absorbable prosthesis.MethodsPartial defects were created in the abdominal walls of 72 New Zealand rabbits and repaired using collagen bioprostheses Tutomesh® and Strattice® or a synthetic prosthesis Bio-A®. Specimens were collected for light microscopy, collagens gene and protein expression, macrophage response and biomechanical resistance at 14, 30, 90 and 180 days post-implantation.ResultsTutomesh® and Bio-A® were gradually infiltrated by the host tissue and almost completely degraded by 180 days post-implantation. In contrast, Strattice® exhibited material encapsulation, no prosthetic degradation and low cell infiltration at earlier timepoints, whereas at later study time, collagen deposition could be observed within the mesh. In the short term, Bio-A® exhibited higher level of collagen 1 and 3 mRNA expression compared with the two other biological prostheses, which exhibited two peaks of higher expression at 14 and 90 days. The expression of collagen III was homogeneous throughout the study and collagen I deposition was more evident in Strattice®. Macrophage response decreased over time in biomeshes. However, in the synthetic mesh remained high and homogeneous until 90 days. The biomechanical analysis demonstrated the progressively increasing tensile strength of all biomaterials.ConclusionsThe tissue infiltration of laminar absorbable prostheses is affected by the structure and composition of the mesh. The synthetic prosthesis exhibited a distinct pattern of tissue incorporation and a greater macrophage response than did the biological prostheses. Of all of the laminar, absorbable biomaterials that were tested in this study, Strattice® demonstrated the optimal levels of integration and degradation.

Highlights

  • Biological and synthetic laminar absorbable prostheses are available for the repair of hernia defects in the abdominal wall

  • The process for which these prostheses are designed is not feasible for the majority of the synthetic polymeric prostheses, which remain for life in the recipient organism; in certain instances, these synthetic prostheses elicit inflammatory and foreign body reactions with the potential for more diverse post-implant complications [3]

  • One of the areas for improvement and research is the control of the prosthetic degradation times, of noncross-linked prostheses

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biological and synthetic laminar absorbable prostheses are available for the repair of hernia defects in the abdominal wall They share the important feature of being gradually degraded in the host, resulting in place the formation of a neotissue. The classic polymeric materials (such as polyester, polypropylene and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene), despite providing satisfactory results, have been replaced by materials of natural origin, the latter mainly from animal sources These implants, called ‘‘biomeshes,’’ which are primarily composed of collagen, can repair but can regenerate new tissue that is similar to that of the human recipient [1]. During this process, the biomeshes undergo a progressive degradation in the host. One of the areas for improvement and research is the control of the prosthetic degradation times, of noncross-linked prostheses

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call