Abstract
The centralization of libraries in the works of domestic experts has received an ambiguous assessment. The experience of the zemstvo system, the development of network construction by mass libraries were negatively interpreted for ideological reasons. A negative assessment of the work on the creation of a unified library network in the pre-war period prevented its development. It took decades for the party-state leadership to revise the criticism of the idea of centralization. During the second half of the 20th century, the centralization of library management structures was supplemented by technologies of interlibrary interaction. The introduction by mass libraries of standards for the bibliographic description of documents, the systematization of funds based on domestic tables of library and bibliographic classification allowed to join the work of interlibrary subscription, depository storage of funds.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of Altai State Academy of Culture and Arts
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
