Re-operative urethroplasty after failed hypospadias repair: how prior surgery impacts risk for additional complications

Abstract

The primary aim of this report was to compare urethroplasty complications for primary distal and proximal repairs with those after 1, 2, 3, and 4 or more re-operations. Prospectively collected data on consecutive hypospadias repairs (tubularized incised plate (TIP), inlay, two-stage graft) from 2000 to 2015 were reviewed. Isolated fistula closures were excluded. Extracted information included patient age, meatal location, repair type, primary vs. re-operative surgery, number of prior operations, any testosterone use, glans width, and urethroplasty complications. Pre-operative testosterone stimulation was used during the study period until 2012. Initially, it was given for a subjectively small-appearing glans, but from 2008 to 2012 use was determined by glans width <14mm. Patients initially managed elsewhere were queried for any testosterone treatment. The number of prior operations was determined by patient history and confirmed by review of records. Calibrations, dilations, cystoscopies, and/or isolated skin revisions were not considered as prior urethroplasty operations. Multiple logistic regression was performed for all patients, and for the subset of patients undergoing re-operation, using stepwise regression for the following potential risk factors: meatal location (distal vs. midshaft/proximal), number of prior surgeries (0, 1, 2, 3, ≥4), pre-operative testosterone use (yes/no), small glans (<14 vs. ≥14), surgery type (TIP, inlay and two-stage graft), and age (continuous in months), with P-values <0.05 considered statistically significant. In contrast to the 135/1085 (12%) complication rate in patients undergoing primary distal and proximal TIP repair, re-operative urethroplasty complications occurred in 61/191 (32%) TIP, 16/46 (35%) inlay, and 49/124 (40%) two-stage repairs, P<0.0001. Data regarding testosterone use was available for 1490 (96%) patients. A total of 139 received therapy, of which 65 (46%) had urethroplasty complications vs. 229 of 1351 (16%) without treatment, P=0.0001. Logistic regression in 1536 patients demonstrated that each prior surgery increased the odds of subsequent urethroplasty complications 1.5-fold (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.25-1.83), along with small glans <14mm (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.48-3.87), mid/proximal meatal location (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.65-3.92), and use of pre-operative testosterone (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.53-4.31); age and surgery type did not increase odds (AUC=0.739). Urethroplasty complications doubled in people undergoing a second hypospadias urethroplasty compared with those undergoing primary repair. This risk increased to 40% with three or more re-operations. Logistic regression demonstrates that each surgery increases the odds for additional complications 1.5-fold. Mid/proximal meatal location, small glans <14mm, and use of pre-operative testosterone also significantly increase odds for complications. These observations support the theory that previously operated tissues have less robust vascularity than assumed in a primary repair, and suggest additional adjunctive therapies are needed to improve wound healing in re-operations. The finding that even a single re-operative urethroplasty has twice the risk for additional complications vs. a primary repair emphasizes the need for hypospadias surgeons to 'get it right the first time'. The fact that 40% of the re-operative urethroplasties in this series followed distal repairs emphasizes that there is no 'minor' hypospadias. A single re-operative hypospadias urethroplasty has twice the risk for additional complications vs. the primary repair, which increases to 40% with three or more re-operations. These results support a theory that vascularity of penile tissues decreases with successive operations, and suggest the need for treatments to improve vascularity. The higher risk for complications during re-operative urethroplasties also emphasizes the need to get the initial repair correct.