Abstract
To evaluate the usefulness of three-dimensional, phase-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) angiography performed with cardiac synchronization in the assessment of renal arteries. Thirty-eight patients (24 men, 14 women) underwent three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography without gating and with systolic and diastolic gating. Conventional angiography was used as the standard of reference. The sensitivity for the detection of all stenoses (> 0%) was 93% with systolic, 92% with diastolic, and 77% without gating. However, there was no difference between the three techniques in the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant stenoses (> 50%). The mean arterial length depicted was significantly better with diastolic gating than with either of the other techniques (P < .0001). Vascular disease was significantly overestimated with systolic gating relative to estimation without (P = .030) or with diastolic (P = .008) gating. Three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography provides good image quality and enables assessment of renovascular disease. Cardiac gating has limited improvement of these results.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.