Abstract

Within integrated steelmaking industries significant research efforts are devoted to the efficient use of resources and the reduction of CO2 emissions. Integrated steelworks consume a considerable quantity of raw materials and produce a high amount of by-products, such as off-gases, currently used for the internal production of heat, steam or electricity. These off-gases can be further valorized as feedstock for methane and methanol syntheses, but their hydrogen content is often inadequate to reach high conversions in synthesis processes. The addition of hydrogen is fundamental and a suitable hydrogen production process must be selected to obtain advantages in process economy and sustainability. This paper presents a comparative analysis of different hydrogen production processes from renewable energy, namely polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis, solid oxide electrolyze cell electrolysis, and biomass gasification. Aspen Plus® V11-based models were developed, and simulations were conducted for sensitivity analyses to acquire useful information related to the process behavior. Advantages and disadvantages for each considered process were highlighted. In addition, the integration of the analyzed hydrogen production methods with methane and methanol syntheses is analyzed through further Aspen Plus®-based simulations. The pros and cons of the different hydrogen production options coupled with methane and methanol syntheses included in steelmaking industries are analyzed.

Highlights

  • The steel industry is energy intensive, being the second-largest industrial energy consumer and one of the most relevant CO2 emission sources [1,2]

  • From preliminary analyses about different possible case studies related relatedtoto partial use of of steelworks off-gases produced in a medium size integrated steelworks

  • The developed hydrogen production been used in order to simulate the generation of this amount of hydrogen and the results reported in Tables 5 and 6 have been obtained

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The steel industry is energy intensive, being the second-largest industrial energy consumer and one of the most relevant CO2 emission sources [1,2]. Steel production is mainly based on fossil fuels for energy supply and accounts for about 4–5% of total world CO2 emissions [3,4]. The primary steel production in integrated steelworks needs more energy than the steel manufacturing in electric arc furnace (EAF), where scrap is used and no chemical energy to reduce. The blast furnace (BF) and the basic oxygen furnace (BOF) exploit an amount of energy in the range of 13–14 GJ/t of produced steel, while the scrap/EAF route needs 4–6 GJ per ton of produced steel [6]. In the steelworks energy costs account for about 20% of the total operation costs [7,8]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.